Submitted by kelvinator1 on 11/14/2007 07:22 PM Flag This Paper
Join Now
The Alien and Sedition Acts brought up a number of issues that were mightily debated among politicians. Most of these issues were effects of the Sedition Acts that politicians either agreed or disagreed with. Because of the Acts, a decade of domestic turmoil and of international crisis resulted.
The primary controversy that developed with the establishment of the infamous Alien and Sedition Acts is that they generated further rifts between the people and the government, as well as politicians against one another in the unstable United States. “They have a womanish attachment to France and a womanish resentment against Great Britain,” said Hamilton (Doc-D). “Let us not establish a tyranny” (Doc-O). One of the more spiteful standpoints of committed anti-federalists was that a centralized government would ostracize power and liberty from the states-and the Alien and Sedition acts proved this true. “That principle…was subversive of the principles of the Constitution itself” (Doc-P). Immigrants were being directly desecrated by the passing of the Alien Act. “Were parties here divided merely by greediness for office” (Doc-F). The Sedition Act managed to oppress one group, Democratic-Republicans, while integrating dominance and administration toward another, Federalists, based solely upon corrosive tendencies within those in governing positions. “…this bill must be considered only as a weapon used by a party now in power in order to perpetuate their authority and preserve their present places” (Doc-P). In essence, the 1789 Alien and Sedition acts proved a monumental fracture within the new country, which threatened the preservation of that federation.
The establishment of the 1789 Alien and Sedition Acts ignited altercation and controversy. “They serve to organize faction” (Doc-H). Passed due to government fear of foreign insurrection, the Alien acts would allow the government to have...