Submitted by dannegru on 10/31/2008 03:13 PM Flag This Paper
Join Now
Black & Decker case
SWOT
STRENGHS
ï‚§ High quality tools as proven in lab and field tests
ï‚§ Highest power tool brand awareness
ï‚§ Higher service rating than Makita
ï‚§ Market share in Tradesmen segment is small which leaves B&D little to lose in making changes to product line
ï‚§ B&D owns DeWalt, a well respected brand that could be used for power tools division WEAKNESSES
ï‚§ B&D brand name not attractive for Professional Tradesmen market
ï‚§ Professional Tradesmen do not respect quality of B&D power tools
ï‚§ B&D brand name is too closely affiliated with household products
OPPORTUNITIES
ï‚§ Professional Tradesmen market is fastest growing power tools segment at 9%
ï‚§ Retailers do not approve of carrying Makita products
ï‚§ Industrial yellow is not used by any brand and it is associated with safety
THREATS
ï‚§ Black & Decker has no access to retail channel of discount stores that Makita dominates
ï‚§ There is a risk of losing market shares in other power tools segments if action taken alienates customers from other segments
ï‚§ Yellow products could be associated with a lemon or poor products
In response to rising concern over product quality, Black & Decker tested its power tools line thoroughly in both the laboratory and in the field. The Black & Decker power tool line proved to be competitive in performance, reliability, and durability (Dolan 2001). Additionally, test users of unmarked Black & Decker tools deemed the products to be of high quality (Dolan 2001). Results from this experiment prove that Black & Decker products are not mechanically inferior to competing power tools.
Black & Decker is one of the highest rated brand names throughout the world
Black & Decker also rates higher than many other brands, including Makita, in terms of service
Causes for the poor performance in the Professional-Tradesmen segment :
ï‚§ Professional-Tradesmen do not respect B&D power tools because of the stigma attached to the Black &...